No, not, nothing, neither, nor, none, nil, no-one, nobody, nowhere.
Notice a pattern?
Why do so many negative words begin with N?
This of course isn’t just true of English:
Non, ni, ne, nein, nicht, nyet, nei, nada, nee etc.
What’s no negative about the letter N?
It’s not unusual for words with similar meanings to look and sound similar, but it is unusual to see so many similar words across so many different languages.
The simple answer is that all these words come from the same Proto-Indo-European root, *ne-, meaning not. But, that’s all too simple. Lots of words in many languages share a basic Proto-Indo-European root, but evolved quite differently over time. Why have all these words stayed so similar?
The most common theory is that it’s due to sound symbolism. Basically, this is the idea that individual phonemes (the most basic sounds that constitute words) can contain inherent meanings. This is similar to the concepts of ideophones and onomatopoeia. With ideophones, words are linked to a fairly general feeling, and onomatopoeia is based on words replicating sounds.
Sound symbolism is a little specific though, with sounds having universal meaning. Linguists generally aren’t too fond of the idea. It’s the opposite of the basic ideas of Ferdinand de Saussure, which are at the heart of modern linguistics. Saussure believed that “the sign is arbitrary,” and the sounds and words we use to represent concepts could be any sounds: we only use our native tongues’ words because we’ve all agreed to use them by consensus, as we can only communicate effectively if we all use the same words with the same meanings.
And I agree with that, basically. In a parallel universe where everything is mostly identical to ours, languages would still probably develop completely different sounds organically.
But, there’s still something to the idea of sound symbolism. For example, have a look at these two symbols:
Which one is bouba, and which is kiki?
Regardless of your native tongue, I bet you said the shape on the left is kiki, and the one on the right is bouba. There’s something inherently sharp about the word kiki, and bouba is round, isn’t it? No-one knows exactly why we think this, but the associations seem to be almost universal. This effect is often used by proponents of sound symbolism to demonstrate that sounds can have inherent meanings, and the naming of objects is not completely arbitrary.
So perhaps that’s the case with negative words. Perhaps there is something inherently negative about the letter N at the beginning of a word. To be honest though, I’m not really convinced. I think that negation is a basic, fundamental concept, that is incredibly general and can be applied to so many aspects of our existence. Because of this, the N sound got attached to it at an early stage, and through common usage, it stuck there, throughout many different languages.
But who knows: maybe there’s a little sound symbolism at play too. While the concept may seem far-fetched, it’s hard to both prove and disprove, so perhaps it does exist. Even if I have my doubts, I’ll never say never.
Interesting
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Korean word for ‘no’ is ‘aniyo’, which has an ‘n’, but then again so does the standard word for ‘yes’, which is ‘ne’. The alternative word for ‘yes’ is ‘ye’.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No wonder Greek sounds so confusing, then, with ne for yes and oxi (sounds like OK) for no? No doubt I’d probably get myself into all sorts of trouble with that 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] of them as (often unnecessary) adornment. But you can see that these ten are quite useful. Not negates something. Usually and often provide important temporal information. Never does both. Very and […]
LikeLike
[…] actually say? It doesn’t, does it? The rhythm’s completely off. There are too many negatives (not, don’t, and wouldn’t all in quick succession). I don’t see any reason why it […]
LikeLike
[…] helps convey a sense of… stoppiness. It’s hard to really know that, and the idea of words having inherent senses to them is a bit problematic. Anyway, there’s still a logic to having stop signs in English. People […]
LikeLike
The Greek for ‘yes’ is pronounced ‘neigh’. The Greeks would be awkward
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] while reading today, and I noticed that it’s a little unusual. We usually think of in- as a negative prefix, making a word the opposite of the word that follows the prefix. But indifferent isn’t […]
LikeLike
[…] could be another of just one of those things. Maybe ab- just sounds inherently worse to us than mis-. It might also be related to the etymology of ab-. It comes from the Latin for away […]
LikeLike
[…] Most nonce words aren’t very well known, because they were just used once. But some are a bit more famous. Remember when I wrote about bouba and kiki!? […]
LikeLike
[…] it’s a case of sound symbolism, with there being something inherent to the sound of sh that communicates the idea of […]
LikeLike
[…] Business was therefore portrayed as “not otium,” constructed in Latin by adding the negative prefix neg-… […]
LikeLike