While I was running this evening, and my mind was wandering, I thought about the phrase a nice round number. I wondered to myself why we call them round numbers. And then almost straight away I answered my own question and said that it’s obviously because of the zero. Which is round. And round numbers always end in a zero.
Well, that’s that. Sometimes the answer is just that simple, and I’m even able to figure it out myself. Not that that stopped me thinking about numbers, and roundness of course.
Because there is more to a round number than that, isn’t there? Roundness as a concept is very attractive. It’s got a sense of completion. You could say that about any shaped where lines join together and don’t leave any gaps, like a triangle or a rectangle. But there’s something about those angles in shapes like that which spoils some of the sense of completion. It doesn’t feel as unified as a nice round circle which has no beginning or end, or pointy parts which stand out from the rest and distract us. There’s a sense of perfection and purity, and completeness, that makes circles appeal to us.
And I think that applies to round numbers too. Round numbers are at the beginning and end of a journey through the main numbers, 1 – 9 (there’s probably a proper mathematical term for them, but I’m calling them the main numbers). That’s a very circular, appealing trip, from one round number to another, repeating again and again, into infinity. We can picture a progression of numbers beginning with 1 like a chain of circles spiralling out into the infinite. And I think that’s why we really call them round numbers, not just because of the zero. Even when we count, we emphasise the round numbers as we speak or subvocalise, with a crescendo rising until we get to the round number and begin again, in a cyclical, circular fashion.
Even the word “round” sounds round. And it’s a pleasant sound, “round.” Interestingly enough though, it seems that there’s a surprising link between circles and language, beyond the mere pleasure of the idea and sound of roundness. The other day, I read this fascinating article, about how our language seems to affect how we draw circles. Try drawing one now, if you can. Did you draw it clockwise or anti-clockwise? Chances are, you drew it anti-clockwise, starting from the top and moving to the left. Most people around the world draw it like that, except for the majority of Taiwanese and Japanese people, who draw circles clockwise. What could explain this difference?
The article will give you the full details, but basically it’s because of the fact that scripts based on Chinese have many circular figures, which are generally drawn in a clockwise fashion, thus leading speakers of these languages to draw circles in this manner. It seems that reading and writing from right to left also influences how we draw circles. Arabic, for example, features similar, slightly-less-circular figures which are usually written clockwise, from right to left. Therefore while most Arabic speakers still draw circles anti-clockwise, the majority is much smaller compared to speakers of languages with the Latin alphabet.
The vast majority of us who use the Latin alphabet draw circles anti-clockwise. It’s a little harder to identify a reason for this, but it seems like letters such as c and g, which we normally begin at the top before turning left, have a strong influence. I was surprised to learn this though, because I draw my circles clockwise. It seems that this might be because I’m left-handed though. Which makes sense, because if I try to draw a circle clockwise, I can’t really see what I’m doing.
I find it fascinating that there’s such a connection between simple shapes like circles, and language. It seems like a natural enough fit when you think about it though, because what is our language, at least our written language, but a series of shapes? They’re specific patterns that we ascribe meaning to, and we do that with non-linguistic shapes too, like triangles and squares. And circles are particularly special, offering us a little hint at a sense of infinity, and that’s why we’re so fond of round numbers. They represent both a beginning and an end, a step in an unending chain, and they’re pleasant to us, even if we don’t consciously consider why.
Well, that’s what I think about when I go for a run anyway.
I’m always going to notice how people draw a circle now. I like teaching young children the letter ‘o’. Your mouth makes a circle when you say it and the letter is also round.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s interesting how the letter looks and sounds round, and makes your mouth round too! I don’t think there’s another letter so closely related to a concept like that.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I really loved this concept! And I completely agree but hadn’t really thought about it until now. PS. thanks for the follow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure, and thanks for yours. I’d never thought about circles so much before yesterday!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m always amazed by those people with hyper-mobility who can drawer a perfect circle on a chalkboard in one swooping motion. The zero on a keyboard is oval, but you know it secretly longs to be round.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know, I’m so envious of them: I can barely join my circles up!
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] probably aren’t as interesting as circles, but they still seem to occupy our minds more than most other shapes. You can see that in the way […]
LikeLike
In ‘The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy’ a “rather surprised looking sperm whale” is ““suddenly … called into existence several miles above the surface of an alien planet”. As it falls, it monologues about the meaning of existence. It “Hey! What’s this thing suddenly coming towards me very fast? Very very fast. So big and flat and round, it needs a big wide sounding name like … ow … ound … round … ground! That’s it! That’s a good name – ground! I wonder if it will be friends with me?”. The 2005 movie adds “Hello, Ground!”.
I saw part of the movie on Korean television. “round” and “ground” totally don’t rhyme in Korean, and “dd … dda … ddang” doesn’t sound “big wide sounding”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] on a particular word. I’ve mentioned before how so many ideas come to me while I’m running. It might be something chemical, and it’s certainly related to the lack of distractions. […]
LikeLike
[…] I think it’s more to do with analogue watches (or just watches, as they used to be known). Those twelve marks or numbers running round the face really draw your attention. The space between them feels like an absence, so we’re drawn more to the multiples of five, which we also of course use for the hours, so we’re also simply used to using them. And of course we like the multiples of ten because they’re round numbers. […]
LikeLike
[…] num- also shows us another reason for the frequency of the error: they’re all related to numbers, and so of course is the word remuneration, as it’s concerned with […]
LikeLike
[…] because when you commit yourself to putting that verb into practice, your body will likely be curved in some way. Depending on how you do it, of […]
LikeLike